Vermont House Takes Step Towards History: Full Tweetcap of the Legislative Action

MONTPELIER, Vt. – It was closer to 4:20am by the time legislators left the Vermont State House at nearly midnight on Tuesday, but by the time they descended from their chamber, they had taken a step towards making marijuana legislation history. That’s because in addition to making significant updates to the state’s medical marijuana program, passing a paid family leave bill, passing an ethics bill, and honoring a high school volleyball team (Go Redhawks), the body passed H.170, a bill that would legalize possession of an ounce of cannabis and cultivation of up to two mature and four immature plants.
The House will read the bill for a third time on Wednesday, May 3 where it may make additional amendments and updates. As of 10:15am, there are already four proposed amendments on the calendar to be discussed, including requiring renters to get landlord permission to consume legal cannabis in a dwelling they rent.
If the bill does pass, it would need to be signed by the Senate, then go to conference committee to be finalized, then be signed by the Governor. By Saturday. The House passing the bill is still a historic and significant step forward for cannabis reform advocates, but it will take significant pressure and momentum to actually sign the bill into law in 2017. To listen to real-time updates of the Vermont House, tune into the Vermont Public Radio live-streams online here.
Here’s a look back at how the historic day and night unfolded:
Back in the State House for what might be the biggest #vtpoli day of the year for (non-medical) legislative cannabis reform and a HISTORIC … pic.twitter.com/S9q94cxp7h
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 2, 2017
The House started the cannabis reform talk early by voting to delay the action on H.167, a bill which originally didn’t involve cannabis at all, but that the Senate had added and passed with a tax and regulate system similar to the S.241 bill the Senate had passed at the end of last session.
Big: House going to delay action on 167 one legislative day, that means only be talking/voting #legalization today #vtpoli
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 2, 2017
The body then took up S.16, a medical marijuana reform bill that started in the Senate. It passed easily by a vote of 130-16. We’ll report on it in more detail as the terms are finalized in a conference committee but hte bill will add PTSD, Crohn’s, and Parkinson’s Disease as qualifying condition, make it faster and simpler to get medical marijuana cards, update the registry website, and allow existing dispensaries to become for-profit businesses and open new outlets in additional locations.
Final count of the S.16 #mmj bill vote in the House :
✅ 130
❌ 16#vtpoli https://t.co/dr9KFFgABS— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 2, 2017
Still no vote on H.170 #legalization yet – but one of the major changes with the S.16 medical marijuana bill is that by October 1st, there … pic.twitter.com/ocWu7B5QRd
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 2, 2017
Lots of discussions in the hallways and committee rooms in the afternoon where votes were tallied and re-tallied and possible amendments discussed.
Lunchtime chatter: few reps sounding optimistic on ✅for H.170, definitely going to be very close #vtpoli
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 2, 2017
In House Democrats caucus – will be talking legalization shortly…should give some insight into upcoming amendments and direction pic.twitter.com/tFkVZcKKEv
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 2, 2017
As noted, a significant question is how the Senate will react to the House passage of H.170. Senator Dick Sears (D-Bennington) was a co-sponsor of last year’s S.241 tax and regulate bill and–as with many Senators–has been frustrated with the House failure to address legalization earlier in the session. When asked what would happen if the House passed H.170 and it went to the Senate, he responded that the only way that marijuana reform that would happen this year was if it came through H.167, as the upper chamber will not have time to vote on 170 and create a new conference committee.
Spoke to Sen. Sears (D-Bennington) about #legalization bill – clear he (and Senate) very much still favor tax + regulate #vtpoli
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 2, 2017
With cannabis interest and political activity at it’s highest, many Vermonters were tuned into the VPR live-stream and flooding twitter and facebook with real-time reactions, especially when the floor discussion started…
#marijuana IS a gateway drug… it led me to #twittering and listening to hours of #VTpoli live on @vprnet. 🤦♂️😂
— GMConsulting (@GreenerMtns) May 2, 2017
One of the ongoing themes for opponents of cannabis reform is that the amounts of cannabis that can be harvested is too much for a single person to consume. Last night, Rep. Chip Conquest (D-Wells River), one of the bill’s original sponsors proactively tackled that question with federal DEA definitions of the size of a joint (.87grams) and an estimated average annual harvest (four ounces).
Per DEA definition of .87g per joint x 4oz/plant per year means produce 268 federal #marijuana joints w/2 plants – Rep. Conquest #vtpoli
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 2, 2017
Even without knowing what those figures were beforehand, representatives were prepared to argue that any homegrown cannabis would be much too much:
“We’re talking about 20 marijuana cigarettes per person per month!” #vtpoli
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 3, 2017
Debate continued into the night as various amendments were discussed. Some were serious proposals, such as the question of passing a tax and regulate system and included sincere discussion.
Now amendment from Rep. O’Sullivan (D-Burlington that would instead tax and regulate a la H.167 and S.241 before it #vtpoli
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 3, 2017
Rep @JanssenWillhoit now speaking forcefully in favor of regulation, blasts colleagues for not having vetted H490 this year #vtpoli
— Dave Silberman (@DaveSilberman) May 3, 2017
Although that amendment failed 42-99, there are more than 42 supporters of tax and regulate in the House; however, many representatives voted against the amendment as a rejection of it diluting the ‘clean’ vote on the legalization-only question.
My no vote was about process https://t.co/qZvjWlDKX0
— Barbara Rachelson (@BRVermont) May 3, 2017
House #vt votes 99-42 against Colorado-style tax-and-regulate marijuana legalization. Still to come, vote on D.C.-style legal possession.
— Terri Hallenbeck (@terrivt) May 3, 2017
Regulation amendment fails 42-99, compared to last year’s 28-117. Lots of No votes were about process, not substance. #vtpoli
— Dave Silberman (@DaveSilberman) May 3, 2017
Other amendments were proposed by sincere opponents who used both tactics and rhetoric to derail and diminish the process of voting on H.170 as it had been passed. This is where the Reefer Madness appeared and things blew up online as listeners reacted to statements by opponents.
Buckle up folks – Rep. Browning is maybe leading Prohibitionist, democrat from Arlington/Manchester/Sandgate #vtpoli
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 3, 2017
Next amendments:
– no legalization until $ for ‘education’
– no until a breathalyzer exists
– no until Feds re-schedule to 3/4#vtpoli— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 3, 2017
#vtpoli #legalization pic.twitter.com/mknZInudLL
— Kind Consulting (@consultkind) May 3, 2017
“17% of youth who use #marijuana will become addicted” – Rep. Gage
Now listing symptoms of #marijuana withdrawal #vtpoli https://t.co/CA3SN8DVsO
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 3, 2017
Now @WrightForBTV quoting Gov Hickenlooper of #CO – just not correctly or accurately
via @cannabist #vtpolihttps://t.co/lT32yEo5vZ pic.twitter.com/LECdXBePTW— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 3, 2017
There really was some extreme rhetoric…
“Consequences are going to be paid for in blood” – a real quote said about #marijuana #legalization by retired judge Rep. Ben Joseph #vtpoli
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 3, 2017
“17% of youth who use #marijuana will become addicted” – Rep. Gage
Now listing symptoms of #marijuana withdrawal #vtpoli https://t.co/CA3SN8DVsO
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 3, 2017
Disoriented teens will be drowning in rivers if we #legalize #cannabis in #VT. pic.twitter.com/Oylyh7Lyip
— GMConsulting (@GreenerMtns) May 3, 2017
Rep. Browining forcefully asking if reps will take responsibility for future #marijuana road deaths “have you measured your responsibility?”
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 3, 2017
The issue was not in fact a strictly bi-partisan one – Rep. Tom Burditt (R-West Rutland) who identifies himself as Libertarian-leaning was one of the bill’s sponsors and along with Rep. Conquest, gave the most clear, concise, and comprehensive speeches of the night in support of the bill.
Rep. Tom Burditt with a powerful speech in favor of H170, referring to the racist history and present of #cannabis prohibition. #vtpoli
— Dave Silberman (@DaveSilberman) May 3, 2017
Reminder that this is the composition of the House and that it’s not strictly partisan issue. Last 2 speakers both dems #vtpoli pic.twitter.com/XvihI4Ecl0
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 3, 2017
At nearly midnight, the House finally did take a role call vote on H.170 (full role call vote results here), which ultimately passed by a very narrow margin of 74-68.
BREAKING: with vote of 74-68 the VT house has PASSED the House legalization bill H.170 which will be read 3rd time tomorrow – get some slee… pic.twitter.com/V8irmZSNDL
— Heady Vermont (@HeadyVermont) May 3, 2017
The House will read H.170 for a third time Wednesday, May 3, almost a year ago to the day after the tax and regulate bill was soundly defeated in 2016.